PORET Sylvaine

< Back to ILB Patrimony
Affiliations
  • 2017 - 2018
    Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
  • 2012 - 2019
    Alimentation et sciences sociales
  • 2018 - 2020
    Centre de recherche en économie et statistique
  • 2017 - 2018
    Centre de recherches de Jouy-en-Josas
  • 2017 - 2018
    Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement
  • 2012 - 2014
    Pôle de Recherche en Economie et Gestion de l'Ecole polytechnique
  • 2012 - 2014
    Ecole Polytechnique
  • 2001 - 2002
    Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
  • 2020
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2013
  • Fair trade and large-scale distribution.

    Sylvaine PORET
    2020
    Fair trade is at a crossroads. Born about fifty years ago, this concept has been gaining interest from large-scale distribution over the past few years thanks to its labelled sector. The sales figures are very promising in North America, but a decline appears in some precursor European countries. This article presents fair trade and its evolution, as well as the debate on the introduction of fair trade products in mass distribution. A statistical study of data collected in the coffee section of supermarkets and hypermarkets in Ile-de-France is also presented. The analysis of the data shows that fair trade is the first argument that discriminates between stores and that coffee sales strategies are decided at the store level.
  • An optimal anti-drug law enforcement policy.

    Sylvaine PORET
    2020
    The author models an optimal drug law enforcement policy that aims to reduce the social cost of drugs. He takes into account the net cost of enforcement, the social damage and the agents' surplus. It considers vertically organized distribution channels with two levels: traffickers and retailers. The two questions are: which type of sellers should the authorities prosecute: traffickers or retailers, and what penalty should be imposed on the seller in case of arrest? The optimal level of the fine depends on the type of sellers arrested, the probability of arrest at the time of the transaction, and the sensitivity of the social harm to the quantities consumed. The author shows that setting the fine at its maximum level is rarely optimal.
  • What trout eat: consumer acceptability of insects in animal feed.

    Pascale BAZOCHE, Sylvaine PORET
    Rencontres du Centre d'Etudes et de Prospective. | 2018
    No summary available.
  • Labels Battle: Competition among NGOs as Standard Setters.

    Sylvaine PORET
    Seminar NGO, Development and Globalization | 2017
    No summary available.
  • What do trout eat: Acceptance of insects in animal feed.

    Pascale BAZOCHE, Sylvaine PORET
    11. Journées de Recherches en Sciences Sociales (JRSS) | 2017
    No summary available.
  • What do trout eat: Acceptance of insects in animal feed.

    Pascale BAZOCHE, Sylvaine PORET
    Workshop Economic Analysis of Environmental Food Policies | 2017
    No summary available.
  • What do trout eat: Acceptance of insects in animal feed.

    Pascale BAZOCHE, Sylvaine PORET
    15 Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists | 2017
    No summary available.
  • Label Battles: Competition among NGOs as Standard Setters.

    Sylvaine PORET
    the 3rd FAERE annual conference | 2016
    No summary available.
  • Study of three regulated markets: drugs, GMOs, and fair trade.

    Sylvaine PORET
    2015
    No summary available.
  • Labels Battle: Competition between NGOs as Standard Setters.

    Sylvaine PORET
    42. Congress of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE) | 2015
    No summary available.
  • Labels Battle: Competition between NGOs as Standard Setters.

    Sylvaine PORET
    64. Annual Meeting of the French Economic Association (AFSE) | 2015
    No summary available.
  • Economic analysis of coexistence.

    Sylvaine PORET, Bernard RUFFIEUX, Louis georges SOLER
    Impacts des OGM sur les filières agricoles et alimentaires | 2013
    No summary available.
Affiliations are detected from the signatures of publications identified in scanR. An author can therefore appear to be affiliated with several structures or supervisors according to these signatures. The dates displayed correspond only to the dates of the publications found. For more information, see https://scanr.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr